The world is preparing to celebrate yet another  milestone in 2012 through the United Nations Conference on Sustainable  Development (UNCSD). This marks the 40th anniversary of the Stockholm  Summit (1972) on human development and environment, and the 20th  anniversary of the UN Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED,  or the Earth Summit 1992). There cannot be a more important event in  this decade to define sustainable development and what it means for the  common man, as we constantly define and re-define living standards and  poverty indicators at the local, national and global levels.
India  should take pride in being one of the few countries in the world that  genuinely engages in debates related to environment and development.  This engagement comes from both its challenges and opportunities. With a  current economy that is resilient and an ecology that is fragile, India  is still looking for ways to achieve sustainable development as it was  defined at the Stockholm Summit — development that is economically  sound, socially relevant and environment-friendly. Recent debates on  whether development should be at the cost of environmental degradation  or environmental protection at the cost of development are still fresh  in memory. Hopefully, these will continue for years to come since  India's development story is still to mature to give any definitive  answers. The only caution here is not to learn the lessons too late.
India's  interest in leading the global agenda on environment in general and  biodiversity (the variety of life on earth that ranges from all the  plants, animals, microbes and other living systems) in particular is  globally recognised. Being a mega-biodiverse country, India is sitting  on a much larger treasure trove than any other country. This treasure is  genuine, and will be perpetual if we invest in its safe-keep and ensure  that it is held by the resource-poor rather than the rich. The country  is yet to wake up to understand the potential of this natural capital  and invest in safeguarding it so that biological resources could  transform the country's economic equations completely. With such an  opportunity, India's response to leading the global agenda on this  particular issue has to be recognised.
Major event
This  is perhaps why it is going to host one of the largest  environment/biodiversity events in the history of humankind: the 11th  Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD-COP  11) in October 2012. With almost near-global membership, the Convention  on Biological Diversity is hailed as the most progressive multilateral  environmental agreement that offers a unique opportunity to  operationalise the principles of sustainable development. India will  influence the global agenda on this issue to a significant degree from  2012 until 2014. Preparations are in full swing to live up to the  expectations of the world with regard to India's role and relevance in  the conservation of natural resources, their sustainable use and the  equitable sharing of the benefits of such use. But is this role  something that India took upon itself recently? Perhaps not.
The  Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, perhaps foresaw as early as in  the 1920s the developments in the context of sustainable development in  2012. As writers and philosophers, and admirers and critics of Gandhi  admit, here is a man whose vision was so forward-looking and inclusive  that almost all of what we intend to define and re-define, and at the  same time struggle to realise, was noted, analysed, linked and suggested  by this great human being decades before.
As a  countdown to CBD COP 11 (October 2012) and an insight into the relevance  of what Gandhiji said and practised in relation to managing the  environment and natural resources, this article attempts to find better  meanings to what was said by him, and relate his vision to today's  realities and challenges as well as opportunities that exist for India.
John  Arden said: “To not to think of dying is not to think of living.”  Environmentalism is perhaps a good example to relate this to.  Environmentalism is facing a huge challenge of not only being relevant  but also being influential. Global assessments indicate that though  biodiversity provides for almost all the goods and services for our  living, it has not found its way into the lexicon of the common man yet.  It is a resource that is given, under-valued and over-utilised.  Biological diversity underpins the very survival of humans on earth, and  is the basis for development and peace. However, natural resources and  biodiversity are exploited to such an extent that resources are lost  forever, unlike elements of climate change that can be reversed through  mitigation and adaptation action.
Gandhiji's famous  quote, “the earth provides enough to satisfy every man's needs, but not  every man's greed,” is such a perfect summation of the principles of  ethics and justice, as elaborated under justice in exchange,  distributive justice, corrective justice and retributive justice. India  is perhaps one of the first countries to enact a national legislation  that considers these principles through the Biological Diversity Act of  2002.
Distinguishing between the needs and wants of  human society, the Gandhian vision and philosophy are finding new breath  in today's discourses related to reducing consumerism, respect for  nature and ensuring equitable development. CBD COP 11 will focus on  biological resources and their role in livelihood security. The agenda  for a ministerial discussion during the CBD COP 11 meeting will focus on  conserving natural resources that underpin securing lives for the local  people. Gandhiji's focus on sustainable development came decades before  we understood the meaning of such development. Sanitation, maternal  health, primary education, gender balance, reduction of hunger, and  ensuring partnerships for development formed the basis for Gandhi's life  and practice long before the Millennium Development Goals were  designed. His antyodaya approach is something that will remain the basis  for sustainable development not just in 2012 but many decades and  centuries to come.
The issue of inter-generational  equity that forms the basis of our discourse on sustainable development  was aptly captured by Gandhi thus: “The earth, the air, the land and the  water are not an inheritance from our forefathers but on loan from our  children. So we have to hand over to them at least as it was handed over  to us.” The practice today is exactly the opposite for many. Enjoy what  you have as tomorrow is not certain. How do we reconcile such change of  attitudes?
Time to commemorate
On his 142nd  birth anniversary, let us commemorate his ideals and principles by  reflecting on the following in the context of our preparations to tell  the world that India is proud to have a profound philosopher whose  vision about conservation and development will shape our world for the  coming centuries. Let us move our environmental management and  conservation action to the rural villages where it means and matters to  people, practise reducing multiplicity of wants, balance rural  development with urban growth, ensure democracy and governance to manage  our natural resources, act in a decentralised manner, and practise the  economy of permanence.
We do have a great tool in  hand to achieve this. The Biological Diversity Act of 2002 that deals  with decentralised governance and management of biological resources,  attempts to work at the level of the panchayat to make rural livelihoods  secure, suggests balancing of conservation with sustainable use,  applies the principles of ethics and equity, and promotes the economics  of permanence through varied partnerships. Where we tend to fail is in  ignoring such tools and frameworks that we have in hand and continuing  to search for the perfect solution outside such a framework.
No comments:
Post a Comment